Has anyone taken a look at this announcement from Google?
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/simple-way-for-publishers-to...
Looks like it might be a new turn in the road for digital content. I'll be honest, I haven't digested it yet. Just thought I would bring it to the attention of this group.
Tags: Google, content, digital
Permalink Reply by River Landing Press on February 18, 2011 at 1:28pm This was announced in the Wall Street Journal yesterday. It's like this, but for serialized reading such as e-zines, newspapers, and paid blogs. Google Books is sort of new.
http://books.google.com/ebooks?id=a91cdyoX49gC&dq=Master%20of%2...
Alice
Permalink Reply by vjlink on March 23, 2011 at 8:30am
Permalink Reply by Theresa M. Moore on April 13, 2011 at 7:36pm
Permalink Reply by Ron Lawrence on July 12, 2011 at 6:52am I haven't had this experience, but the first thing I would do is to try the prescribed process for removing a book. I take it that you have made attempts to use Google's standard procedures for removing your book?
For books scanned via the Library Project...
http://books.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=43756
For a book you submitted...
http://books.google.com/support/partner/bin/answer.py?hl=en&ans...
This last page clearly states: "Copies already sold will continue to be served to the customers who bought them." EBooks "served" via Amazon and Google are not simply files that are delivered to your device. It is a service that insures that the book will always be there--even if you change devices. The content is (potentially) delivered to your reader on demand. So, your reader--while it is capable of a great amount of storage--is not limited to that capacity. What this means is that someone who purchased a previous copy of your eBook expects that copy to be available when they request it. That means that Google and Amazon must retain it if copies have been previously sold.
I have to say, that avoiding the use of Amazon and Google may be O.K. for some books, but I don't think that advice should be applied to all. If your marketing plan calls for a wide distribution, you would be closing yourself off from some very powerful distribution tools if you avoid them. Like many things, this decision should be evaluated for each book. And, obviously, if you do choose to go this route, you'll want to be careful about what you are offering up, because there are strings attached.
Also, even if you decided NOT to offer your book on Amazon or Google, an agent who has the right to sell your book may choose to do so--unless specifically prohibited. For example, I've got a CD on Amazon that I never put there.
Permalink Reply by Theresa M. Moore on April 13, 2011 at 7:33pm
Permalink Reply by Theresa M. Moore on May 4, 2011 at 3:36pm
Permalink Reply by Theresa M. Moore on May 21, 2011 at 10:19am http://www.spannet.org/profiles/blogs/when-a-good-partnership-goes?...
The problem exists with Amazon, too. I think a safe thing to do is avoid dealing with both and just use your other resources. At one time I loaded a product feed to Google's Merchant Center hoping to get more exposure but tracking of the API impressions and click backs shows that nothing is going to happen. As for self publishing houses which charge an arm and a leg I don't use them, either. CreateSpace and Lulu both publish for free but the extras (like proof copies) cost $$. It's only natural.
As for editing, that is a problem but it's the author's responsibility to get the manuscript into a workable state before it is digitized, including the editing. I happen to edit my own only because I know how. I would not recommend it to newbies or young people.
The fact is that none of us really "needs" a large aggregator to sell for us. When we trust one to manage these things, there is always the risk that things will go wrong.
© 2013 Created by Brian Jud