The analogy only goes so far, but it really makes sense to me. When it comes to building your blog, do you prefer to rent the digital property for construction, or to own it? Or, in more relevant terms, do you choose a "hosted" solution, or and "installed" one?
Renting, with a hosted solution, is very popular. Renting can be free, such as Wordpress.com, Blogger.com, Spaces.Live.com, and numerous others. Or, renting can be for a cost, such as Typepad.com. But the distinction is that someone else owns the digital real estate. In essence, it's their address, not yours. All of your possessions, your site files, are in your landlord's possession.
Owning, with an installed solution, is also very popular. It means that you go out and "buy" your own digital real estate on which to build your blog. You buy some server space, you build your blog, and you control it all (OK, I know, you don't really buy the real estate if it's a shared hosting plan, but you still have control.) It's your address, and your alone. All of your possessions, your site files, are in your control.
I've built both kinds of blogs, and both are good. You can "live in" any blog, but what is the advantage to either renting or owning? I have some philosophic thoughts about it, and I'm sure others more technical than I can provide more pragmatic insights. What do you think?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Gary Roberts on April 9, 2010 at 1:04am
Permalink Reply by Gary Roberts on April 9, 2010 at 10:48pm © 2012 Created by Bradley Flora.